Tom Cooledge

Icon

My thoughts on social media, PR and who, truly, was the very best Thundercat.

The Tempest 2.0

Last weeks blog, based on child-focused marketing, was a bit bleak especially for Christmas.

To balance out, there’s a feature in Design Week which showed this same age group wielding the power.  In designing a touch-screen educational program for the Tate, Magnetic North creative director Brendan Dawes went to great pains to pander to a scrupulous audience with ‘attention spans of nil.’ 

Based on critical thinking, his frustration could be borne from differences in between generations rather than their age. Children of the latest generation might not have the same patience as adults but, from growing up with technology, are far more capable with technology than we were at their age. (I say ‘we’ because I can’t be the only one poor with a Wii, right?) 

Theorist Durisin claims 98% of ‘Generation Yers’ (adolescents that have had developed with constant access to New Media) are positive that computers have positively impacted their lives. Generation X / those that matured before the internet became popular are far more reluctant to agree. 

Echoed by Futurist Marc Prensky, members of Generation Y are ‘the digital native’ and those of Generation X ‘the digital immigrant.’ The latter might learn to ‘adapt’ to technology but always keep the mother tongue or ‘their “accent” […] their foot in the past.’

Prensky goes on to address the dangerous void between the two. The Native’s random-access learning style, acquired through digital interaction, alienates the Immigrant’s bookish teaching style (‘slowly, step-by-step, one thing at a time, individually, and above all, seriously.’) However, Durisin is more optimistic. 

The Native’s confidence has bred complacency. Durisin’s test group failed to source breaking news online by relying on logarithms of search engines established weeks before. Also, Generation Y was less able to evaluate ‘spurious’ web content, searching for information and ‘simply applying criteria uncritically.’ 

Generation X and their experience with a wider variety of media may be more inclined to check other sources and, therefore, safeguard Generation Y from the unhealthy stakeholder relationships discussed last week. 

However, let’s acknowledge our true responsibility as members of Gen X: to practice Guitar Hero religiously and show the kids how it’s done.

Filed under: Advertising to children, Generations

Vid from Lapland

Does anyone else remember posting a letter to Santa in a battered cardboard post box at the supermarket? Even if you didn’t get a reply, it was a buzz.

Well, for the first time, it was him that contacted me. I was emailed a video last week where the man himself reprimanded me for gossiping and spending too much time on Twitter. Either I changed my ways or remained on the Naughty List.

When I was 8, I wouldn’t have dreamed micro-blogging could land me in hot water. Also, I would never have expected an email direct from Santa’s workshop. Probably because neither existed.

Mashable blogger Amy-Mae Elliot lists other Web 2.0 solutions to reaching Kris Kringle this year; why not ask Virtual Santa a question or checking out his grotto on a Finnish web feed?

Some of these methods are better suited to those not yet at, what theorist Denise Bortree calls, the ‘Concrete Operational stage.’ Children under 7 years tend to be less biased, susceptible to persuasion and, therefore, less likely to ‘dissect’ poor Santa.

This group also struggles to interpret non-verbal communication’s full meaning; they can’t scrutinise Web 2.0 Santa like the older kids.

Or even Web 2.0 altogether.

It is only those at the Concrete Operational or ‘Fully Operation stage’ (12 years and over) that think abstractly. In the context of Bortree’s thesis, they begin to appreciate what an organisation is and their relationship to it.

Immature, pre-Operational children and the opportunism of online content has been a long-standing cause for concern. Bortree attributes ‘the epidemic of childhood obesity’ as the partial responsibility of internet advertising.

Behavioural scientists French and Story agree; preschool websites prove internet use begins at the same time ‘pester power’ is first exercised by a child: children first specify request a branded product at only 24 months. Forums and brand-own sites designed for toddlers often feature games, puzzles, videos, wallpapers etc. advertising food products, according to the scientists.

The Guardian’s Mark Sweeney noticed a concerning 11% rise in online junk-food marketing in 2008 despite an impressive 46% decrease in TV ads.

Although he suggests the trend will not become fully established under a vigilant government, let’s hope the internet remains just a portal for Father Christmas in the meantime.

Filed under: Advertising to children, Online marketing

About Tom


Tom is a PR professional with six years experience of working within Leeds' creative community. With a background including events management and journalism, he recently graduated with an M(Sc) in Corporate Communications and continues to support high profile clients on national B2B and B2C campaigns.

Follow me: @tomcooledge

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Contact me…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.